1. VI. Ministry Years
    1. I. The Twelve Named (Mt 10:1-10:4, Mk 3:13-3:19, Lk 6:12-6:16)

Some Key Words (7/5/06)

Summoned (proskalesamenos [4341]):
To approach, come near. | from pros [4314]: from pro [4253]: in front of prior to; toward, near to, and kaleo [2564]: to call aloud. To call toward, summon, invite. |
Authority (exousian [1849]):
Permission, authority and right. The power to do. The right and the power combined. | from exestin [1832]: from ek [1537]: the point of origin from which things proceed, and eimi [1510]: I exist; it is right. Capacity, competency and freedom to act. Delegated influence. | The power to choose what one will do. Physical and mental ability to do. The power of authority and right. The power to govern by command.
Heal (therapeuein [2323]):
To attend to and serve, to care for. To heal miraculously. | to wait upon. To adore. To relieve. | To serve. To restore to health.
Disease (malakian [3119]):
An infirmity, softness, effeminacy. Weakness. | from malakos [3120]: soft. Softness. Debility. | physical weakness or sickness.
Sickness (noson [3554]):
disease or sickness. | a malady. Occasionally used of a moral disability. |
Apostles (apostoloon [652]):
sent forth. An ambassador. This word is rarely used in classical Greek. The term designates both the office and the authority of those called by Christ Himself. One who bears witness to Christ. One must bear in mind the dual usage – on the one hand, the particular office held by the twelve, on the other the more general witness to Christ. | from apostello [649]: from apo [575]: off or way from, and stello [4724]: to set fast; to set apart, send out on a mission. An ambassador of the Gospel, with miraculous powers. | A delegate. One sent forth with orders. The apostle surpasses all other forms of Christian teacher, and all other spiritual gifts. False teachers are denounced for having laid hold of this title for themselves. In some places, the title is given to other prominent teachers.
First (prootos [4413]):
First in order of time, situation, or dignity. Chief, principal. | The superlative of pro [4253]: in front of, prior to, superior to. Foremost in time, order or importance. | First in rank, influence and honor [although pointedly not so used in this passage. Instead, the meaning for this verse is taken as simply being the first to be listed.]
Appointed (epoieesen [4160]):
To make. To endow one with a particular quality. To appoint. | | To form or fashion. To cause. To prepare. To provide for oneself. To make one anything. To constitute or appoint. To declare one something.
Called (prosephooneesen [4377]):
| from pros [4314]: from pro [4253]: in front of, prior to; forward, toward, near to, and phoneo [5455]: from phone [5456]: a tone, a saying, language; to make a sound, to speak to by name. To address, to summon. | To call to, to summon to oneself.
Chose (eklexamenos [1586]):
To choose, select, give favor to. To choose from among many. | from ek [1537]: point of origin, from, out of, and lego [3004]: to relate in words. To select. | To pick out for oneself.

Paraphrase: (7/5/06)

Lk 6:12-13 It was at this point that Jesus went away to the mountain to pray. He spent the entire night in prayer, and when day had come, He called His disciples to Himself. He then selected twelve from among them whom He named as apostles. Mt 10:1, Mk 3:13-15 These twelve He called apart to the mountain and when they had come to Him, He gave them authority to cast out spirits, and to miraculously heal all manner of illness and disease. These twelve were appointed to be with Him and to be sent out to preach. Mt 10:2-4, Mk 3:16-19, Lk 6:14-16 These were the twelve He chose: first there was Simon, to whom Jesus gave the name Peter, and his brother Andrew; also James and John, the sons of Zebedee, whom Jesus had called the Sons of Thunder. Philip and Bartholomew were also chosen, as well as Matthew the tax-gatherer and Thomas. James, the son of Alphaeus was among the twelve, as was Simon the Zealot. Then, there was Judas, the son of James [perhaps later known as Thaddaeus], and of course, Judas Iscariot, His betrayer.

Key Verse: ( 7/9/06 )

Lk 6:12He spent the whole night in private prayer to God before He chose the twelve.

Thematic Relevance:
(7/5/06)

As He was given authority, so He gives authority. Further, as Luke makes clear, He does not simply choose as He sees fit, but rather as the Father chooses. In all things submissive.

Doctrinal Relevance:
(7/5/06)

Authority is given, not taken.
Our service is by His choice, not our own.
Every decision is to be made with prayer.

Moral Relevance:
(7/5/06)

To the twelve, He gave particular authority in full accord with the authority given to Him by the Father, after consultation with the Father. He did not simply take up the authority given Him and ignore the giver. He was not presumptuous in His application of the authority clearly given Him, yet we can often be so presumptuous as to assume we have an authority which was not given us. Here, the authority is given specifically to twelve out of how many, by His choice alone. I should be careful, then, that I do not take upon myself any authority which He has not specifically assigned to me, never to assume I have the right or the power to act, but as He did, to pray long and hard before proceeding in one accord with my King.

Questions Raised :
(7/9/06)

Only the obvious questions regarding the identities of the less well-documented apostles, particularly Judas Thaddaeus, but also Bartholomew Nathanael, and others.

Symbols: (7/6/06)

N/A

People Mentioned: (7/6/06-7/9/06)

Simon Peter (7/6/06-7/7/06)
Simon comes from the Hebrew Shim`own [OT:8095]: from shama` [OT:8085]: to hear intelligently and with obedience. Peter comes from the Greek, indicating a piece of rock larger than a stone. Peter and his brother Andrew were fishermen in Galilee (Mt 4:18). By Luke’s account of his calling, it seems Peter recognized Jesus as being heaven-sent from the start, falling at His feet in worship, and begging Him to depart for he was himself a sinful man (Lk 5:8). At a later date, when crossing the Sea of Galilee, it was Peter who spoke to Jesus as He crossed the water on foot. As proof of Himself, Peter suggested He command him to come out to Him on the water. Jesus did, and Peter went out, but became nervous and lost focus, sinking (Mt 14:28-30). Peter was willing to accept his own ignorance, asking Jesus to explain His parables when he didn’t understand (Mt 15:15). He was also the one with the answer when Jesus asked His disciples who they understood Him to be. “You are the Christ, God’s Son,” declared Peter. It as on this occasion that Jesus bestowed the name Peter upon him, declaring that His church would be built upon the rock, such that all the power of hell could not prevail against it. Here, too, He declared that the keys of the kingdom were given into their hands, such that the heavens would be moved to support their activities on the earth (Mt 16:15-20). Mark and Luke make no mention of this blessing, only of the warning that they were to tell nobody about it (Mk 8:29-30, Lk 9:20-21). Following on this event, we learn that Jesus began to tell His disciples of what was to come in Jerusalem, how He would be killed and raised again. Peter was indignant, drew Jesus aside and rebuked Him [for His negative confession?]. This led to Jesus rebuking Peter in turn, for he had become a stumbling block, too focused on his own interests to see what God was doing (Mt 16:21-23, Mk 8:31-33). Luke makes no mention of this confrontation, only reporting what Jesus was teaching (Lk 9:22). Peter, along with James and John were brought up to the mountain with Jesus to witness His transfiguration, and His council with Moses and Elijah. Peter’s reaction was to express the desire to build tents for them in that place (Mt 17:1-4). According to Mark’s account, this came some six days after Peter’s confession of Jesus as the Christ. He attributes Peter’s suggestion of building tents to the fact that Peter was terrified (Mt 9:2-6). Luke puts the events a few days later (Lk 9:28-33). Matthew provides an account of paying the taxes in Capernaum, which would have been of particular interest to him, I suppose. He indicates that the local collector approached Peter, wondering at Jesus’ failure to pay His taxes. He defended Jesus as a law-abiding citizen, and then went to speak to Him about what had happened. Jesus taught him by way of a parable that the taxes taken by the temple representatives ought not to apply to sons of the kingdom, as kings don’t tax their own children, but only strangers However, He would not offend the temple authorities in this matter, so He sent Peter to retrieve a fish by hook, and told him he would find payment for both Jesus and himself in that fish’s mouth (Mt 17:24-27). Peter was the one who asked Jesus how often we are to forgive a brother, offering seven as a generous limit. Jesus, however, raised the bar, suggesting four-hundred and ninety might suffice (Mt 18:21-22). Peter was also willing to voice his real motivations. At one point, he notes how they have left everything they had to follow Jesus, and then asks Him what’s in it for them (Mt 19:27, Mk 10:28, Lk 18:28). Only Matthew notes that follow-up question. Peter expressed a certainty not only in his willingness, but in his ability to stick with Jesus no matter what might come, no matter who else might leave Him. Jesus foretold, however, that he would deny Him thrice before the sun was fully up in the morning (Mt 26:33-34, Mk 14:29-31, Lk 22:33-34). Jesus took Peter, James and John with Him to pray in His hour of distress, but they kept falling asleep (Mt 26:37-40, Mk 14:33-40). When Jesus was taken to Caiaphas, Peter followed, but at a distance, sitting at the edges of the crowd (Mt 26:57-58, Mk 14:53-54, Lk 22:54). Peter remained in the courtyard, where a servant-girl noticed him, and recognized that he had been with Jesus. But he denied this. Another also recognized him as an acquaintance of Jesus, and again he denied it. Later, others came and accused him of being one of Jesus’ disciples, noting his accent. He began to curse, swearing he did not know Jesus. No sooner had he said this than a rooster crowed and he realized that Jesus’ words regarding him were fulfilled. Great was his sorrow (Mt 26:69-75¸ Mk 14:66-72, Lk 22:55-62, Jn 18:15-18, Jn 18:25-27). Mark’s account notes that it was the same servant who had pointed him out the first two times. Luke suggests that the second encounter was with a man, and adds that in the moment that the rooster crowed, Peter’s eyes met the Lord’s. John notes that the last one who accused Peter was related to him whose ear Peter had struck off in the garden. Mark writes of a time when one of the officials from the local synagogue had sought Jesus out on behalf of his daughter, but servants came informing him that his daughter had already died, that he need not bother the Teacher on this matter, it being too late. Jesus, however, had overheard the conversation and responded with, “only believe.” He went with that official, allowing only Peter, James and John to come with him. These three, plus the parents, were the only witnesses to her restoration to life (Mk 5:35-43, Lk 8:51-56). Peter was also the one who noticed that the fig tree which Jesus had cursed was now dead (Mk 11:21). Peter, James, John and Andrew came to Jesus in private, seeking to know when the kingdom would come (Mk 13:3-4). When the angel spoke to Mary after His resurrection, He gave her instructions to go tell the disciples, particularly Peter, that Jesus would meet them in Galilee (Mk 16:7). When the woman reached out and touched Jesus in the midst of the crowds and Jesus asked who had touched Him, Peter answered from his store of common sense, noting that there were crowds all around pressing in on Him (Lk 8:45). Peter and John were sent to prepare the Passover (Lk 22:8). When the women came from the tomb, reporting to the others what had happened, there was general disbelief, but Peter ran to the tomb to see for himself (Lk 24:11-12). By John’s account, Jesus gave Simon his new name when they first met (Jn 1:42). Peter’s was the voice of confidence, or perhaps desperation, when other disciples began to leave. “To whom shall we go?” he asked. “You have the words of eternal life. We have believed them, and know You are the Holy One of God” (Jn 6:68-69). During their last meal, when Jesus moved to wash Peter’s feet, Peter was indignant to see his Teacher behaving as a slave. Jesus, however, informed Peter that he must either accept this service or have no part in Jesus’ ministry. At that, Peter’s response shifted to great enthusiasm, suggesting that if this were the case, he would gladly have Jesus wash his hands and head as well. Jesus, however, noted that it was only the feet that needed washing (Jn 13:6-11). Peter goaded John into asking Jesus who it was He was talking about, who it was who would betray Him (Jn 13:24-26). Hearing that Jesus was departing, Peter wanted to know where He was going, why he couldn’t follow along (Jn 13:36-38). It was at this point that Jesus prophesied regarding the rooster. When they came to arrest Jesus, Peter drew his sword, and struck the high priest’s slave, but Jesus told him to put his sword away (Jn 18:10-11). Mary ran first to Peter and John when she saw the empty tomb, and these two ran to see that tomb, John reaching it first, but fearful to enter. Peter went in and saw the empty wrappings (Jn 20:1-7). Simon, Thomas, Nathanael, James and John and two others were out fishing through the night with no success. At day break, there was Jesus on the beach asking after their catch. He suggested they cast to their right, which they did. The catch was so great they couldn’t even pull the nets in, but had to drag the nets to shore instead. Peter recognized Jesus, and jumped ship, swimming ashore (Jn 21:1-9). After eating breakfast, Jesus asked Peter how great his love for Him was. Twice He asked, and Peter’s response indicated a love somewhat lesser than what had been asked. Yet, each time, Jesus responded by telling him to care for His sheep. The third time Jesus asked, He asked after that lesser love, and Peter was saddened to have caused this change. Yet, the command remained the same. Jesus then told Peter how he would die for God’s glory and called him to follow. Peter saw John following and asked Jesus what was to become of him. Jesus told him to be concerned only with following as he was commanded (Jn 21:15-22). The remaining eleven were all together in that room in Jerusalem, accompanied by those women who had become part of the ministry and by the mother and brothers of Jesus. In that place, Peter stood and made the point that they needed to replace Judas Iscariot (Ac 1:13-15). Later, after the impartation of the Holy Spirit, Peter stood with the others, and began to preach to those gathered outside wondering what was going on (Ac 2:14). Such was his preaching that many from that crowd were convicted by the message. They asked Peter and the others what they should do, and Peter called them to repentance and baptism, so that they might be forgiven for their sins and that they might receive the gift of the Holy Spirit (Ac 2:37-38). So effective was this message that around three thousand souls were saved that day (Ac 2:41). One day, Peter and John went up to the temple to pray. On their way, they encountered a man in the temple gate who had been lame from birth, and was therefore begging alms. He began to entreat Peter and John as they passed, and the two looked at him. “Look at us!” they said. When they had his attention (for he was expecting to receive something from them), Peter declared, “I have no money to give you, but I do give you what I have: In the name of Jesus the Christ, the Nazarene – walk!” He took that man by the hand and lifted him up. Well! That man’s feet and his ankles were strengthened in that moment and he jumped up and began walking! He joined them as they entered the temple, and he was leaping about and praising God. All the people there saw this and took note. They realized he was that same man they always saw in the gate begging and they were amazed to see what had happened to him. That man would not leave Peter and John, and the people were gathering around them on Solomon’s porch. Seeing the crowds gathering, Peter preached again. “Why do you marvel? Why look at us as if we had done something by our own power or by our own righteousness? The God of our fathers glorified His servant Jesus, though you disowned Him. You put Him to death, but God raised Him to life as we can attest. It is on the basis of faith in His name, the name of Jesus, that this man (whom you have often seen and know full well was lame) has been given perfect health in your very presence” (Ac 3:1-16). Later, pulled before the Sanhedrin for this act, Peter preached again. “If we are on trial for healing the sick, then let it be known how it was done. It was done in the name of Jesus the Christ, the Nazarene, the one you crucified but God raised from the dead. It is by His name that this man stands before you today, fit and healthy. He is the stone you builders rejected, but He has become the Cornerstone. You will find salvation in no other, for there is no other name given among men by which we must be saved.” Seeing Peter’s and John’s confidence, and knowing that they were uneducated men, they marveled, and recognized that they had been with Jesus. Seeing also the man healed and standing by their side, there was nothing they could say (Ac 4:8-14). When Ananias tried to claim that he had contributed more than he had, Peter confronted him, asking him why Satan had been able to prompt him to lie to the Holy Spirit. He made it clear that Ananias had lied to God first and foremost, and Ananias fell down dead from his fear on hearing this. A few hours later his wife came, carrying the same false story. Peter confronted her as well, to the same effect. They carried her out and buried her next to her husband. A great fear came upon all who heard about this. Many other signs and wonders were taking place around the apostles, and they were gathered together as one in Solomon’s porch. Nobody else dared to be with them, though they were held in high esteem by the people, and more believers were coming daily. Indeed, the people carried their sick into the streets hoping that Peter’s shadow might fall on them in passing (Ac 5:3-15). Brought before the Sanhedrin again, Peter and the apostles declared that they must certainly obey God rather than men, when there was a conflict (Ac 5:29). When the other apostles heard that the people of Samaria had received the Word, they sent Peter and John to pray for them, that they might also receive the Holy Spirit. This they did, and one Simon, a magician, saw what was happening and offered to pay for the gift of imparting the Spirit as well. Peter, however, rebuked him for even thinking that he could buy God’s gifts, and called him to repentance (Ac 8:14-23). Peter was traveling through Judea, Galilee and Samaria, healing folks in his travels, including a lame man in Lydda, and Tabitha of Joppa, whom he raised from death. Because of this, many came to the Lord in belief (Ac 9:32-42). While Peter was staying at Joppa, Cornelius, having been visited by an angel, sent for him. At the same time, Peter was having his own visitation, in which God declared things formerly unclean to be clean. Peter, typical to his nature, at first refused to change. However, when the messengers arrived, he began to understand the point. He went to Cornelius, and Cornelius began to worship him, but Peter made him stop. These two talked at length, and at the end, the Holy Spirit came upon Cornelius and his household. This surprised the other believers who had come with Peter, but they heard for themselves as these Gentiles spoke in tongues, exalting God. Peter proceeded to baptize the family, and then stayed with them awhile. Those back in Jerusalem heard of this and took issue with Peter when he returned. But Peter explained what had transpired, including his own reticence to accept the message of his vision. He finished recounting the events with this point: “If God gave them the same gift He gave us, who are we to stand in His way?” At that, they ceased their complaints and glorified God (Ac 10:5-11:18). Having put James to death and seeing that this seemed to please the Jews, Herod decided to take Peter, too. They siezed him during the days of Unleavened Bread and put him in prison until the Passover could be completed. So Peter was in prison, but much fervent prayer was going up to God on his behalf. It came about that on the eve of the very day Herod intended to execute him, as he was chained between two soldiers behind a guarded door in the prison, an angel appeared and awoke him. The chains fell from him, and the angel told him to follow, which he did. Even as he reached the outside, he didn’t realize this was really happening; thought it was only a vision. But, they passed the guards and came to the gate. The gate opened of its own accord and out he went into the street. As soon as they were out, the angel left, and Peter came to his senses. How could he doubt that the Lord had rescued him? Well, he went to Mary’s house where everybody was praying, and knocked on the door. The servant who answered was so excited to hear his voice that she forgot to open the door. She ran to tell the others, but they weren’t buying it. However, Peter kept knocking, and eventually they opened the door. Seeing him there, they were amazed. But, he simply told them to let the others know he was safe, and then went elsewhere. When Herod learned of Peter’s escape, he ordered those soldiers who had been in charge of him executed (Ac 12:3-18). When Paul and Barnabas came to Jerusalem to sort out the matter of circumcision for the Gentile believers, there was a great deal of discussion. Some of the believers, having come out of the sect of the Pharisees, declared that circumcision was a necessity for all believers, but Peter reminded them of what God had been doing amongst the Gentiles, how He had made no distinction. He rejected the idea of putting a greater burden upon these believers than had God Himself, for the Gentiles were saved as the apostles had been, solely by the grace of the Lord Jesus (Ac 15:1-11). Paul recognized that his mission was to bear the gospel to the uncircumcised even as Peter was charged to bear it to the circumcised. It was, after all, the same God who worked so effectually in both of them (Gal 2:7-8). Peter was an apostle of Jesus Christ to the chosen amongst the Diaspora (1Pe 1:1), a servant of Christ, serving those who had received the same faith as his own; serving by the righteousness of Jesus Christ, our God and Savior (2Pe 1:1).
Andrew (7/7/06)
manly.’ Andrew was a fisherman like his brother Simon. Jesus saw them out fishing and called them to become fishers of men. They left their nets and followed Him (Mt 4:18-19, Mk 1:16-18). Andrew shared Simon’s house, along with Simon’s mother-in-law (Mk 1:29-30). Andrew came with Peter, James and John to find out from Jesus when the kingdom would be coming (Mk 13:3-4). Andrew was the one who heard John the Baptist talking about Jesus. He went and found his brother, saying, “We have found the Messiah.” The two went to meet Jesus, at which point Jesus told Simon he would be called Peter. The following day, Jesus intended to head back to Galilee, and found Philip, calling him as well. Philip was from Bethsaida, like Andrew and Peter were (Jn 1:40-44). When it came time to feed the masses, Andrew noticed the young man with his loaves of barley bread and his two fishes. He also recognized the impossibility of feeding so many with so little (Jn 6:8-9). Amongst those going up to worship were some Greeks who sought to meet Jesus. They came first to Philip, and Philip went and told Andrew. These two spoke to Jesus of the matter (Jn 12:20-22). Andrew was still there when they chose Matthias to take the place of Judas Iscariot (Ac 1:13).
James (7/7/06)
i.e. – Jacob. From Ya`aqob [OT:3290]: from aqab [OT:6117]: to circumvent or restrain; ‘supplanter.’ James was in the boat with his father and brother when Jesus called. He and John immediately left the boat to follow. This family were partners of Simon and Andrew (Mt 4:21-22, Mk 1:19-20, Lk 5:10-11). James, along with John and Peter, was in Jesus’ inner circle, witness to the transfiguration (Mt 17:1, Mk 9:2, Lk 9:28), and to the raising of the synagogue official’s daughter (Mk 5:37, Lk 8:51). His mother was present at the cross (Mt 27:56), perhaps the one named Salome (Mk 15:40), who went with the two Maries to prepare Jesus’ body (Mk 16:1). James and John were with the group when they went from the synagogue to Peter’s house (Mk 1:29). James and John approached Jesus at one point seeking places of honor in His kingdom. Jesus asked if they really thought they could go through what He would have to go through, to which they replied that they were able. Jesus confirmed that they would indeed go through these things, but He could not promise them the honors they sought. The others took offense, upon hearing of this matter (Mk 10:35-41). James was in the group that came to find out from Jesus when the kingdom was going to be set up (Mk 13:3-4). It was again Peter, James and John who Jesus called to pray with Him in His hour of distress (Mk 14:33). James and John were indignant with the Samaritans for rejecting Jesus. They asked Him if perhaps they ought to pray for fire to come down and consume those rebels, but Jesus rebuked them for this attitude (Lk 9:52-55). James was with the others in the upper room, where they devoted themselves to prayer (Ac 1:13-14). Herod had James killed to appease the Jews (Ac 12:2).
John (7/8/06)
from Yowchanan [OT:3110]:God has graced.’ Called from the boat with his brother James (Mt 4:21, Mk 1:19, Lk 5:10). John was one of the three with Jesus at His transfiguration (Mt 17:1, Mk 9:2, Lk 9:28), at the raising of the official’s daughter (Mk 5:37, Lk 8:51), and in the hour of His distress (Mk 14:33). He and James were there at Simon’s house (Mk 1:29). John raised his concerns with Jesus when he saw others casting out demons in His name, men who were not amongst His followers. Jesus, however, pointed out that those who were not against Him must be for Him (Mk 9:38-40, Lk 9:49-50). He and his brother came to Jesus looking for places of honor in the kingdom, swearing that they could undergo the same trials Jesus would face. Jesus responded that they would indeed face those trials, but that it was not His place to assign the honors they sought. The inquiry caused a good deal of offense amongst the rest of the disciples (Mk 10:35-41). Later, Peter, Andrew, James and John came to Jesus with questions regarding when the kingdom would be set up (Mk 13:3-4). James and John suggested calling fire down on the Samaritans for their rejection of Jesus, but Jesus rebuked them (Lk 9:52-56). Peter and John were charged with preparing the Passover (Lk 22:8). Like the rest of the apostles, John was there in the upper room (Ac 1:13). He was with Peter at the temple when they healed the lame man (Ac 3:1-11), and stood with him before the Sanhedrin on that account, where the two would declare to the leaders of religion that they must obey God rather than men (Ac 4:13-19). He was also sent with Peter to pray for the Samaritan converts, that they might receive the Holy Spirit (Ac 8:14-15). Herod had his brother James killed (Ac 12:2). John, along with James and Peter, was accounted one of the principal leaders of the church in Jerusalem (Gal 2:9). John was entrusted with a revelation of things to come, him having been witness to the word and to the testimony of the Christ for he had seen the whole course of His ministry. He recorded his revelation for the benefit of the churches established in Asia. He had suffered through the persecutions and troubles they had seen, and labored for the same heavenly kingdom they pursued. That he was on the island of Patmos to receive this vision was in fact part of the punishments meted out to him for his testimony regarding God and Jesus (Rv 1:1-9).
Philip (7/8/06)
fond of horses.’ Jesus sought out Philip specifically before leaving the Baptist’s camp for Galilee. Philip immediately went and told Nathanael that he had met the Messiah, and called him to come meet Him, too. Jesus greeted Nathanael as one without guile, a true Israelite, which rather surprised him. He was compelled to confess that Jesus was surely the Son of God and the King of Israel (Jn 1:43-49). Jesus, seeing the crowds, asked Philip where they might buy sufficient bread to feed these crowds. This was but a test for Philip, for Jesus knew what He would do. Philip responded that the cost of giving even a little bit of bread to each one there would be prohibitive (Jn 6:5-7). The Greeks, seeking to meet Jesus, approached Philip first, for he was a Galilean from Bethsaida, making for a more comfortable approach on their part. Philip brought the matter to Andrew and then they two went to Jesus (Jn 12:21-22). As Jesus made plain that He must go, it was Philip who asked that HE show them the Father. Jesus responded with sorrow. “Do you still not now Me after so long, Philip? Whoever has seen Me has seen the Father. So, how can you ask me to show Him to you again? Don’t you believe that I and the Father are in each other?” (Jn 14:8-10a). Philip was there in the upper room (Ac 1:13), and it was he who preached to the Samaritans to great effect. Many were delivered and the city rejoiced. There, too, was Simon the magician, and the people also thought him to be a bearer of God’s power. However, the preaching of Philip won out, bringing many to seek baptism, even Simon himself, for he was likewise amazed with the miracles that were occurring around Philip (Ac 8:5-13). Later, Philip was sent south toward Gaza to reach a certain Ethiopian eunuch who served the queen of that land. At the prompting of the Spirit, he went to that eunuch’s chariot and found the man reading Isaiah. So, he offered to explain the passage to the eunuch, by the end of which explanation, the eunuch was seeking baptism. No sooner was the baptism accomplished than Philip was taken away by the Spirit, and Philip found himself in Azotus, where he began preaching in every city between there and Caesarea (Ac 8:26-40). Luke later recounts visiting one Philip the evangelist in Caesarea, declaring him ‘one of the seven’, a man with four daughters who were all prophetesses. It was here that Agabus came from Judea and prophesied over Paul (Ac 21:8-11).
Bartholomew (7/8/06)
son of talmay, ‘furrowed son’. Bartholomew is not mentioned by this name other than in the lists of the apostles here, and in the upper room (Ac 1:13). There is some suggestion that he is the same one known as Nathanael (from Nethan’el [OT:5417]:given of God’, whom Philip brought to Jesus (Jn 1:45-49). This may be the same Nathanael of Cana who was with Peter, Thomas, the Zebedees and a couple of other disciples when Peter decided to go fishing, and Jesus met them on the shore (Jn 21:2-6).
Thomas (7/8/06)
twin.’ Thomas is another that we don’t know much about. We know he bore the name Didymus, with the same meaning of twin. When Jesus announced that He would return to Jerusalem, Thomas was shaken, and responded with some degree of cynicism that they ought to go with Him, so they could all die together (Jn 11:16). It was Thomas who expressed confusion when Jesus said He was going somewhere where they would be as well. “If we don’t know where You’re going, how can we hope to know the way there?” Jesus responded, “I am the way, and the truth and the life. No man comes to the Father except it be through Me.” This led up to Philip’s request (Jn 14:4-6). Thomas had not been there when Jesus first came to the apostles after His resurrection, and was a bit reticent when it came to accepting their account of having seen Him. He insisted that he must see Him himself, and touch the wounds ere he would believe. Eight days later, Jesus gave him the opportunity, and he believed (Jn 20:24-28). Thomas was there for the fishing trip (Jn 21:2), and in the upper room (Ac 1:13).
Matthew (7/8/06)
to war.’ Found in the apostolic lists, here and in Acts 1:13. Otherwise, only noted at his calling, when Jesus called him from his place in the tax office (Mt 9:9).
James Alphaeus (7/8/06)
Mark notes Matthew Levi as being a son of Alphaeus (Mk 2:14). Perhaps, then, Matthew and James were brothers. It is also possible, one supposes, that he is the same identified as James the Less, brother of Joses (Mk 15:40). If so, his mother was with the others who went to prepare Jesus’ body (Mk 16:1, Lk 24:10). By any account, he was there in the upper room (Ac 1:13). Which of three James’ wrote the book bearing his name is uncertain (Jas 1:1).
Thaddaeus (7/9/06)
courageous.’ The only mention of this man is in these current verses. Sometimes noted as bearing the name Lebbaeus as well. Presumably to be identified with Judas of James, or Judas (not Iscariot). [Fausset’s] This is also suggested as being the author of Jude, which would make him brother to both James and Jesus. [ISBE] Extra-biblical sources referenced by Origen indicate that Thaddaeus was called at the Sea of Galilee along with the four. Other texts suggest he may have become a missionary to Syria. There is also some evidence of a connection (along with Thomas) with the place known as Edessa.
Judas of James (7/9/06)
from Yehuwdah [OT:3063]:celebrated.’ There is one other note regarding this other Judas. He raises a question to Jesus, wondering why He has decided to make Himself evident to them, but not to the world (Jn 14:22). [Fausset’s] Assuming him to be the author of the epistle, he is not the son of James, but the brother thereof. [It should be noted that ‘son of’ is an assumption in the text, not something specifically stated.] That Jude would not be noted by his relationship to Jesus is perhaps not as surprising as it seems. Strictly speaking, both he and James were but cousins, or as we might think it, step-brothers. Here, it is supposed that James and Jude were both sons of Alphaeus a.k.a. Clopas and Mary, presumably because Joseph had passed on. [ISBE] Here, preference is given to ‘son of’ James, but no reason is given. Some suggest that Thaddaeus died before Jesus, and was replaced by this Judas. It is also claimed that he cannot be identified with Jude, but again there is no reason given for this conclusion. [M&S] Here, it is simply said that there is not full agreement as to whether this apostle is to be associated with the brother of Jesus. By one theory, the James and Judas who were brothers to Jesus were sons of Mary and Joseph, while they who were apostles were sons of her cousin of the same name. Else, there is the option suggested by most of the early fathers, that they were children of a prior marriage to either Escha or Salome. Then, there is the opinion of Jerome, that they were cousins, children of Mary and Cleopas (known also as Alphaeus). The theory runs that Cleopas was Joseph’s brother, married to Mary, who may or may not have been related to Mary, mother of Jesus. It is then suggested that Cleopas died childless, leaving it to Joseph to bear children in his name. Thus, before Jesus was born to Mary, James and Jude were born to Joseph according to Mosaic law (Dt 25:5-6 – In such cases, the husband’s brother shall take the widow as wife and bring forth sons by her to his brother’s name. The first-born son shall bear the name of the deceased.) James being the eldest would bear the title son in particular fashion as indicating him the heir to Cleopas’ property. The texts connecting Jude with the church in Edessa are shaky. These same suggest that he died of natural causes after preaching in the regions around Israel. Other sources suggest he was martyred in Phoenicia, and still others that this occurred in Persia. Another tradition recorded by Eusebius suggests that Domitian had two grandsons of Jude brought to him, but dismissed them upon seeing how poor they were and that they were confessors of the Spiritual kingdom of the Christ. These later became leaders in the church.
Simon the Zealot (7/9/06)
called the Zealot, a member of the Jewish independence party bearing the same name. He is not mentioned outside the apostolic listings, so far as I can see. [Fausset’s] suggests that he, too, was a brother of Jesus. [One issue with this theory would seem to lie in Luke’s claim that the brothers of Jesus did not believe until after His resurrection.] The appellation ‘the Canaanite’ is not intended to indicate his descent, but is a Chaldean term of the same meaning as zealot. Certain texts make him the successor to James as bishop of the church in Jerusalem, and that he was martyred under Trajan, since he would have been a legal successor to the throne as David’s descendant. [M&S] The Zealots were ‘fierce advocates of Mosaic ritual.’ Eusebius declares that the three apostles James, Judas and Simon were not brothers of Jesus.
Judas Iscariot (7/9/06)
The last name traces possibly to ‘iysh [OT:377]: manly, and qiryah [OT:7149]: city. [which would make it ‘city of man,’ perhaps?] Judas went to the chief priests, looking to see what they might pay for Jesus’ betrayal. Receiving thirty silver pieces from them, he began to look for opportunity (Mt 26:14-16, Mk 14:10-11, Lk 22:3-6). At the Passover meal, Judas feigned innocence when Jesus mentioned that His betrayer was at table with him. “Surely, you don’t mean me, Rabbi?” But, Jesus replied, “You said it” (Mt 26:25). Later, in the Garden, as Jesus awoke His companions, Judas came along with an armed crowd sent by the priests and elders. He had instructed them that they were to seize the One whom he kissed. He went up to Jesus and greeted Him with a kiss, and they came and seized Him, He having given permission for this to happen. (Mt 26:47-50, Mk 14:43-46, Lk 22:47-48). When Judas saw the results of his betrayal, how Jesus was condemned, he tried to return the money to the priests, but they would not accept it. He threw the money into the sanctuary, ran off and hanged himself. The priests, however, would not allow this blood money to be put into the treasury and instead used it to buy a burial place for strangers. This fulfilled Jeremiah’s prophecy that they would take the price put on His head, thirty silver pieces, and give them for the Potter’s Field (Mt 27:3-9). When Peter was assuring Jesus that they would not leave Him as others had, Jesus noted that He had chosen the twelve Himself, even though one of them was a devil. This was a first foreshadowing of what Judas would do (Jn 6:68-71). Judas was indignant at the waste when Mary anointed Jesus’ feet. He said the perfume should have been sold and the money given to the poor. However, John notes that this apparent concern for the poor was a show. In reality, he was stealing from the poor box, and that was why he wanted the money there (Jn 12:4-6). The devil inspired Judas to betray Jesus (Jn 13:2). When Jesus spoke of one betraying Him, they began to wonder who He spoke of. Peter convinced John to ask, and Jesus, in response, indicated Judas. He then told Judas to get on with it quickly. The rest did not understand His meaning, but figured he had sent Judas to buy something for the feast, or else to give to the poor. At any rate, Judas left immediately (Jn 13:21-30). When they had gone to the Garden, Judas knew where they would be, as they met there often. He had received a cohort, as well as officers of the Temple guard, and these came well armed. Jesus asked who they were looking for, and they told Him. He said, “I AM”, and they fell to the ground. Again He asked them, and again they answered. Jesus again said, “I am He. If you are looking for Me, let these others go away.” This was done to fulfill His prophecy of having lost none of His own (Jn 18:1-9). When Peter spoke to those gathered in the upper room, he noted how David had prophesied concerning Judas, who had been one of their number. He recounted how he died in the field he had bought with the price paid for Jesus. He then called for a replacement to fill the place left by Judas. Matthias was chosen to complete their number (Ac 1:16-26).

You Were There (7/9/06)

N/A

Some Parallel Verses (7/10/06)

Mt 10:1
Mk 6:7, Lk 9:1 – He called the twelve and then sent them out in pairs, with authority over unclean spirits, and power to heal. Mt 9:35 – Jesus went from town to town, teaching and declaring the gospel of the kingdom, and healing all manner of disease and sickness.
2
3
4
Mk 3:13
Mt 5:1 – Jesus, seeing the crowds gathering, went up on the mountain and sat. His disciples came to Him there. Mk 6:7, Lk 9:1 – He called the twelve and gave them their assignment.
14
15
16
17
18
19
Lk 6:12
Mt 14:23 – He sent the crowds away and then went up the mountain to pray by Himself. Lk 5:16 – This was something He would often do. Lk 9:18 – On one such occasion, His disciples came to Him, and He asked them who people were saying He is. Lk 9:28-29 – On another, He took Peter, James and John with Him. It was on this occasion that He was transfigured.
13
Mk 6:30 – The apostles gathered around Jesus on their return, and reported what they had done and what they had taught.
14
15
16

New Thoughts (7/11/06-7/16/06)

I have noted three points of doctrine that are brought forth in these verses, which I shall consider each in its turn. The first of these points is concerned with choice. It is a point that needs to be held in mind whenever we are involved in matters of the kingdom. The point is simply this: We serve at His choice, not our own. It is not for us to call the shots, to decide what we shall do or when we shall do it. We are, after all, spoken of as servants of the Lord. Yes, we are brothers. Yes, we are co-laborers. But, with all that, we are still servants, bond-servants. A bond-servant has the unique qualification of having chosen to bind himself in service to the one who chose him. This is as true of the apostles as of us. Look at their writings. Every one of them makes a point of declaring their status as bond-servants of the Lord.

Consider how these men became apostles. Not a one of them chose to be in that position. Not a one of them. Indeed, the whole thrust of the message in these verses is that Jesus chose them. More to the point, the Father chose them. Three words, I find, are applied to this event. First, Luke tells us that He called His disciples to Him. Here is the first thing to know about our status. We who have believed on His name were called by Him. The great fallacy of the seeker-friendly concept is that anybody is seeking. Not at all! We each come to Him because He has summoned us, and the summons of the Lord of all Creation is not something we are at liberty to ignore!

One thing I would note about this calling: It is something that applies to all believers. When He called, He called all of His disciples, not just those He was going to appoint to specific duty. We are all to be counted amongst those whom He summons to Himself. We are all, then, to be counted amongst His disciples. Of course, we are well aware of that verse which says that many are called but few are chosen (Mt 22:14). In its place, that message comes as part of a discussion of the wedding feast and of the ones who rejected the invitation. I think we can apply the same message here, though. The only difference I can see is that the opportunity to reject the offer is long past.

So, Jesus calls all of His disciples to Him, Luke says, but out of them He then chooses twelve for a particular service. They were chosen from among many, being the ones He had picked out for Himself. Notice that He did not ask for volunteers. Neither did He ask them if they wished to accept the position He was putting them in. He chose them, and that was the end of it. When God chooses, how can there be any further discussion on the topic? Granted, it happens. We need look no further than Moses to see that. He was chosen to rescue Israel and his immediate reaction was to point out that God surely must have him confused with somebody else. However, I would point out that even there, the option of refusing the choosing was never on the table. Moses had been chosen. That was the end of it. It might take some time to come to grips with that choice, but it wasn’t his choice to make. The choice had already been made.

One other thing I would bring to our attention with regard to this choosing. As I noted, all of His disciples had been summoned to Him for this occasion of picking out the ones He had particular purpose in mind for. The whole crowd was there to see these twelve honored by His choosing. What I find rather significant about this is that there is nothing said about any jealousy or complaint amongst those whom he did not choose.

Here is a key factor in avoiding jealousy in the kingdom: As my worship leader was saying last night, none of us are in position because of our qualifications. Those called to be His apostles were not called because they had shown themselves particularly astute in the things He was teaching them. None of them had displayed a particularly strong characteristic of righteousness that would commend themselves to His attention. No, their only qualification was that He chose them.

So, I see that Jesus chooses to honor those He chooses, to make all of His people aware of His purpose for these particular servants. Why would this be? Is it not so that those of us who are not assigned to the task directly can support those who are by our prayers and by our means? God does not elevate this man or that woman so that they can enjoy the accolades of the little people. He elevates them so that all can see them, see what He is doing in and through them, and join with them in support. Notice the record of the early church: They were all together and in one accord. They weren’t busy jockeying for position. They weren’t so distracted by their politicking that they couldn’t pursue their own assignments. They were united and fully behind those who had been chosen as leaders.

I would also offer this word of comfort to the un-chosen. It is only for this specific assignment that you have not been chosen. Dare I say that all who are called of Christ are chosen? We are simply chosen for different assignments. I have been chosen for study and for worship. These are the peculiar assignments I have been given to pursue. My wife, on the other hand, is chosen for prayer. Does this mean that I don’t pray, or that she doesn’t study? Of course not! It comes back to that whole point of many called, few chosen. We are all called to pray. Some, however, are chosen to pray with a particular dedication and fervor that eludes the rest of us. We are all called to worship, but some few of us are chosen to create the instruments, the sounds and the songs; to create the atmosphere in which all can worship. We are all called to study that we may show ourselves approved. However, we are also taught by those studies that only the few who have been chosen should become teachers.

The word of God is that He chose each one of us before we were even born. Before ever egg met sperm, He was well aware of you. Not only was He aware of you, He already had in mind the particular things He had for you to accomplish for His kingdom. That is point Paul is making when he writes to the church in Ephesus that, “we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, works God prepared beforehand so that we could do them” (Eph 2:10). Notice a few things about that verse. First, we were created in Christ Jesus. In spite of what our life experiences may have convinced us, we were His from conception! We may have wandered pretty far afield in our younger days, but we were always in Him. Second, we were created with purpose! God had specific things in mind for us. We were not brought to life for no reason. We are not a mindless accident of cosmology. We have specific things to accomplish for Him in Whom we live and breathe and have being. We are all chosen to do those things that He has prepared for us to do, so that we can come to Him with some good works under our belt, not wholely and utterly wanting.

Come to that third word, now. I said that those He chose were not chosen for some pre-existent qualifying character or ability. The apostles were not ‘apostolic material’ before Jesus made His selection. Rather, there was something that came with the choosing. Mark says that He appointed those twelve He had chosen. That word ‘appointed’ is an interesting thing. It shares with the Greek word for making things. It shares not only the grammatical root, but somewhat of the concept as well. See, when God chose these men to be apostles, He not only declared them to be so, He made them so. He endowed them with the necessary abilities and capacities. From a bunch of men that religion had cast aside as worthless – tax-collectors and fishermen, of all things – men unlettered and in some cases unclean; from such as these He made His choice, and then He formed them into something completely different. He imparted to them qualities that they had not in themselves. He made them apostles.

In those things for which we are chosen, we should recognize that we share this aspect of being appointed, made and endowed with the necessary ingredients to accomplish the work for which we were created. We should also recognize the purpose of our appointment and pursue it. But, in pursuing our purpose, we must never fall into the trap of thinking we shall do it in our own strength. We shall accomplish great things, but it shall be because of Him Who fills us, Who equips us, Who appoints us.

The apostles, in particular, were appointed to be just that: apostles. They were appointed to be ambassadors, men sent out to bear the message of the kingdom. As ambassadors, it should be clear that the office was not something they just took upon themselves. Ambassadors do not volunteer, they are appointed. They serve by the choice of the kingdom they represent. That, too, is key to remember. They serve as representatives of a kingdom. Corporations and social organizations do not have ambassadors. They may have representatives, but they have no ambassadors. Kingdoms and nations have ambassadors. The apostles were, then, not merely representatives of Jesus or His ministry. They were representatives of the kingdom over which He is Lord.

As ambassadors, they also bear the authority of the kingdom they represent. They speak as on behalf of that nation. They are empowered, as Pastor Najem has taught us, to draw upon the resources of that kingdom to support their efforts on behalf of the kingdom. They are also empowered, within certain bounds, to negotiate treaties with other nations on behalf of their kingdom. These treaties must, of course, be ratified by the Lord of the kingdom, but they are empowered to form the nature of the treaty. They hold this authority because they can be trusted to put forth only such things as are truly in the interest of the nation they represent. There is another point regarding the apostle: With their authority and their assignment comes responsibility.

An ambassador is responsible to represent the interests of his kingdom accurately. He cannot afford to have his own agenda, because the moment his agenda deviates from that of his nation, his authority to act is at an end. It is the greatest embarrassment to an ambassador to negotiate a treaty his nation refuses to sign. That is the mark of failure for his career.

As an ambassador of Christ’s kingdom, how can we even think to promote our own agenda over His? How can we even think to negotiate, really? Ours is not to negotiate with the kingdoms of the earth, but to bring them into submission to Him Who rules over all. It is not a matter of violence, as some false religions might represent the case. Not at all. It’s a matter of rescuing the prisoners, rescuing those who have been caught up in the web of deceit spun by the ruler of this dark age.

Now, let me turn back to the apostles once again. Notice this about them: They were appointed to be sent out, and they were sent out primarily to preach. This is interesting. It was not even so much to teach, but to preach; to proclaim the news of the kingdom which was no longer coming, but was now come. In the course of that pursuit, they also had authority to cast out the servants of the usurping devil, and to heal the effects of having been held captive in his slave camps.

There is something in all this that we must bear in mind, though. These twelve were specifically appointed; chosen by Christ and made to be what they were appointed to be. We share in many aspects of their calling, but not in that same office. We are all called to be apostles with a little ‘a,’ but those who were appointed to the office of Apostle with the big ‘A’ were a specific group. When the time came to replace Judas, the qualifications for office were clarified. There is one simple portion of that qualification that we must surely recognize makes it impossible that any should hold that same office today: They had to have been eye-witnesses to the entire course of Jesus’ ministry. By Peter’s words, the one who would be an Apostle must have been there from the time John was baptizing right through the time of the Ascension (Ac 1:21-22). Now, he also says that the one who would assume office must have been one who went with them, was known to them, a companion through that time. Since Paul was later included in their ranks, we must understand that some portion of the qualifications Peter puts forth were specific to that particular replacement. This is a large part of why Paul stresses his office and his call to office so often. He did not fully fit the mold that these twelve understood. However, we cannot, I think, set aside the whole of these qualifications, else we have made the office nothing.

Paul understood the personal call of Christ, His personally putting the man in office as being the fundamental, unchangeable requirement. In some sense, were this the only qualification, we could all lay claim to the office today. Anybody who felt they had heard Jesus say, “You are an apostle,” could make this claim without further ado. Some do. I’m not so sure that the eye-witness part was ever set aside, though. Paul may not have gone in and out with the others, may have been on the side-lines, watching skeptically, but he was certainly around to have known about this Jesus.

So, can there be an Apostle in our day? I really don’t think so. Who is there on this earth today who can lay claim to having been eye-witness to the events of Jesus’ lifetime? Not one. Who is there who truly functions in the full realization of that office? To do so, they must surely be accompanied by miraculous confirmations. Yes, there are those who can claim healings. I would note, though, that the apostles served more as missionaries than as pastors. If they pastored a church, it was but for a season, to establish the work in a new region. They were concerned with the faith as a whole, not so much with a specific congregation. Of course, their care for those in the places they had planted would be greater than for those they knew only by reputation or rumor. That’s natural. But, fundamentally, the concern was more for seeing the kingdom grow.

Finally, I would have to say that their exercise of the authority Jesus had vested in them showed them faithful to the kingdom they represented. No place was found for personal agenda in any one of them. Every moment and every aspect of their lives was given over to the service of the kingdom. Every action they undertook was to promote the interests of the King. Everything they did was submitted to the authority of Him who delegated authority to them. Find me one who fulfills all these aspects, the requirements and the evidence, and I will accept an Apostle in my day. Until then, the claims to such an office are no more than that: claims.

Authority is given by God. This was as true for Jesus the Man as it is for us. He had authority because it was given to Him by the Father. In the same fashion, those He appointed as Apostles had authority because He gave it to them in turn. I notice, though, that in delegating His authority to them, He did not lose sight of whose authority it really was. He did not simply choose as He pleased, though the twelve were the ones He Himself wanted, as Mark says. Luke informs us that Jesus had spent the whole of the previous night in prayer before making this decision.

So it must always be with authority in this kingdom: ever submissive to the One from whom all authority flows. Authority is not ours to take, nor, when given, is it ours to presume upon. To the extent that we have authority, we have it with that same responsibility that belongs to any ambassador: to use that authority in pursuit of the Lord’s purposes. The Apostles learned this lesson well. They saw the example of their Teacher, who prayed so long and fervently for God’s will in His own choice of them. When the time came for them to delegate a portion of their authority, they likewise besought the Father in prayer, that they might delegate only to those He would have them delegate to.

It is not just in matters of setting up the chain of command, though, that prayer is important. Prayer must be the precursor to every decision we make. And I’m not talking of that sort of prayer which just begs for God to bless what we’ve already made up our minds to do. I’m talking about that sort of prayer that will not make a move until God reveals His own plans in the matter. At the very least, any start we might make on a particular move must be subject to His approval or rejection, and something we willingly and gladly set aside should He express disapproval.

There are times that at least seem to us to require some action on our part whether we have heard God’s word on the matter or not. I have been in such positions myself often enough. In those times, it is no sin to take steps as seems wisest to us. However, with each step, pray that He will direct your footfall. Pray that He will so move as to prevent you from pursuing something outside of His will, and that He will make the path straight and easy when your steps are pursuing His will. Then, remain aware of how things are proceeding. If every attempt is being stymied, understand that your prayer has been answered and stop. Pray all the more fervently for clarity of direction.

It was this way with us when first we thought to move. We did everything we could think of to find a new place in the area it seemed to me we were to relocate, and with everything we tried, we followed it up with prayer. Always, those prayers included the request that He would shut any door we were not meant to go through and open the one He wanted opened. Well, a week or so of doors slammed shut got His point across. This wasn’t the way. A bit more prayer and seeking and lo! The idea of moving had been correct, it was just the location that had been wrong – for that time. The door He had for us opened with seemingly no effort from us. The place we were to move to was just there. Years later, when the location I had thought right then really was right, the effort required to find a place in that location was just as simple, just as free of every problem. Every decision is to be made with prayer; preferably before acting, but most certainly while acting.

Jesus, as the ultimate Teacher, sets the example for us. We see it not only here, but often throughout the record of His ministry. Matthew records another time when He sent everybody away and then went up into the mountains to pray by Himself (Mt 14:23). Luke tells us that this was something He did often (Lk 5:16). The lesson of this is twofold. First, as I said, everything – particularly as it applies to ministry – needs to be awash in prayer. It is no more than seeking the command of our Commander, after all! Second, He sets the example of refusing to presume upon His own authority. All authority is given to Him, yet He still seeks out the Giver of that authority before taking action. We see it here, in His choosing of the Apostles. He chose the ones God gave to Him to choose, having sought long and hard to make certain He heard the list correctly from His Father.

Surely, if it was necessary for Him to pray so fervently about His actions, we need to pray harder still! Surely, if He could not simply act as He saw fit, having the authority, we who receive our authority from Him cannot simply do as we please. Even in those things which we have been authorized to do in the past, I think we must recognize a necessity of praying to confirm a continued authorization. We must pray for a clear understanding of the bounds of our authority as well as the purposes. How else shall we pray in His name if we are not checking in with Him to confirm His plans?

I am in one of those places of decision and action even now. There are matters which I have been bringing before my Lord in prayer, and have even thought I heard my answers. Yet, in some ways the answers I was hearing seemed inconsistent. This is a time for persistent prayer, prayer that continues to seek direction of my God until He has made direction clear, to seek clarification until the picture can be seen plainly. As I continued in prayer, I did not receive contradicting information, nor would I expect to. If God has said this thing must be done, I would hardly trust my senses should He then turn around and say it didn’t need to be done after all. What came of continued prayer was better understanding of some parts of the answer which I had not recognized as answers at all. Parts of my answer were coming from different sources and in different ways, and I hadn’t recognized that they were meant to fit together so as to form the whole picture. In truth, I was to some degree too frustrated by the first part of the answer to really grasp that there was more to be heard.

Now, as I see His complete answer, I am in a way awed at how He has worked all these things together. Yet, I will not, at this point, cease from praying. As I take steps to comply with the things I have come to understand as His plan, I will continue to seek Him out, to confirm the path I think He has set me on, and do my utmost to remain open to any course correction He sees fit to make.

There is something recorded in the story of the early church that really struck me. It is something that could easily be overlooked, coming almost as an aside to the story of Ananias and Sophira. But, following on the conclusion of that episode, there is this brief mention of the progress of the Church. It is said that they were gathered together as one in Solomon’s porch. Then, the point is made that nobody else dared to be with them, though they were held in high esteem by the people, and more believers were coming daily (Ac 5:12-14).

There is a sense of isolation that can come upon us as we stand for Christ. Yes, thank God, we have the fellowship of our fellow believers, but we seem such a small group in the midst of such a crowd of unbelief. There will be times when it seems that all our efforts are fruitless, that we stand together but make no visible impact. Well, in those times we must remind ourselves of this record of that first church. They were together, united in one purpose. That is key! As Jesus taught, a house divided against itself cannot stand (Mt 12:25). They were all there for one reason, and where were they? They were right their among the people, out in the midst of the lost. They hadn’t hidden away in the upper room. They didn’t compartmentalize their lives, making sure to keep their religion for private moments. They were having church right there in the midst of public life.

Now, notice what is said of the public reaction. In spite of their respect for this group, they would not dare to be seen with them. This comes back to that whole echoing message of ‘walk worthy.’ Their public practice confirmed their faith in God, and God publicly confirmed His pleasure in them. “Signs and wonders were taking place.” God was pleased to acknowledge these children who acknowledged Him not only in words, but in actions. So, the people could do no other than to honor these who clearly had God’s attention. Yet, they feared to be associated with them. Why? Because the official stance of the world was enmity to this group – enmity with God. The Temple was determined to squash this new belief. They had already shown themselves willing to put under the ban anybody who believed, although it had not yet taken to stoning the believers. That would come in time. But, the risk of the ban was more than most folks could bear. It meant exclusion from just about every aspect of Jewish life, perhaps the worst thing being exclusion from the sacrifices which were the only redemption they knew. Then there was the social cost, as nobody would associate with one under the ban. Even making a living, getting one’s foodstuffs could become a problem in this circumstance. So, it is perhaps no surprise that there was this public avoidance. However, that’s not the whole story. In spite of this public reticence, we find out that more and more were believing, and multitudes were ‘constantly added’ to the Church.

So, here’s my point. First, it is incumbent upon us to get out of our cloistered places of worship once again. We may have rejected the idea of monastic life, but in many ways we still live it in practice. We have been trained by the world to keep our religion to ourselves. Faith is fine in your home, or amongst like-minded people, but is somehow inappropriate as a matter to be expressed, say, at the restaurant, or in the parks. This becomes particularly true as faith requires an exclusive hold on Truth. The world doesn’t like exclusive claims. It fails the multicultural test. It becomes embarrassing, if not risky, to be seen as a man of faith. There is this initial hurdle for the would-be believer to overcome. That being the case, they may not be willing to associate with us in public display for a time. It may be years before they can bring themselves to this point.

Seeing this may lead us to despair a bit. We feel as though our efforts are bearing no fruit. But, here in the message of Acts, I find encouragement. Be faithful! Be open and public about your faith. Though they may not join you in this activity, men and women are believing in the Lord because of your willingness to stand out as a child of God. In spite of the message we hear regarding the shrinking demographic of professing Christians, we know the battle goes to us in the end. Multitudes are constantly added to our number, though we may fail to see them at present. God still has His remnant.

One last thing I shall comment on, which is not directly related to this section of Scripture, but the juxtaposition of these two passages caught my eye. First, there is Peter’s response when Jesus’ words had become too hard for most to bear and the number of His disciples was being diminished. He turned to the twelve He had appointed and asked them if they were going to toss it in as well. Peter, in his typical fashion, took it upon himself to answer for them all. “Where would we go?” He asked. “You have the words of eternal life. We believe this. We believe You. And, we have understood, over time, that You truly are God’s chosen Messiah” (Jn 6:68-69). Later, when Philip asked Jesus to show them the Father, Jesus gave this response. “Whoever has seen Me has seen the Father. Don’t you believe?” (Jn 14:8-10a).

So, what is it I see connecting these two things? It is this: Words of Life. Let me offer up a third quote to make clear the connection. “This is eternal life, that they may know Thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You sent” (Jn 17:3). Words of Life. Peter was not quite accurate in his confession. Jesus does not have words of life, He is the Word of Life! He is the expression of the Father, made manifest and comprehensible to man. Hear that statement He makes. “If you have seen Me, you have seen the Father.” If we know Him, we know the Father. To know the Father is eternal life.

Then comes that question which has come so often of late. “Do you believe this?” See how the question plays out in the two cases. Peter: We have believed this: that You have the words of life. Jesus: You have known the Father in knowing Me, and that knowledge is eternal life. Do you believe this? See, it is knowing this that will empower us to leave everything else behind. It is knowing this that will give us the fortitude to invest everything we think we have in gaining this one thing, this one pearl of great price.

When we first meet Peter, Andrew and the brothers Zebedee, we are told how they left their boats, just dropped their nets at the shore, and then went off with Jesus. Our immediate reaction is, wow! They just threw away their whole livelihood to go with Jesus. No visible means of support for them. Recognizing that Peter was a married man, with not only a wife but a mother-in-law as well to care fore makes this all the more shocking to consider. But, it’s not really the case. It’s our own addition to the story. Consider that between the time Jesus was crucified and the time He ascended to heaven, Peter had pretty much given up on this whole ministry thing. He and the others returned to what they knew, what they had ‘left behind’, and went fishing. They went in the same boats they had seemingly abandoned those long years ago. I would say this: If Peter had truly abandoned his responsibility to family, he would not have found a place with Jesus. In the same way, had Abraham really gone through with the sacrifice of his son, I sincerely doubt he would have found a place reserved for him in God’s kingdom. His faith and obedience, his willingness to sacrifice his dreams were key to establishing the rightness of the covenant God had made with him, but to have carried through would have gone too far. So, too, with the demands Jesus puts upon His disciples. Yes, He says that those who display an unwillingness to set aside everything else for the pursuit of the kingdom are not fit to enter in. Yet, He is also the one who condemns the abuse that was the practice of corban. God does not condone the neglecting of our responsibilities in the name of serving Him. He is honored by our honoring our commitments.

Marriage is a covenant vow. How can we think that serving the covenant God would permit us to neglect the terms of the marriage covenant? Peter did not. He was able to leave the boats because he knew that the family business could be run without him. His wife and his mother-in-law would be taken care of as he pursued this ministry. Yet, in a very real sense, he could say that he had left it all. He was married, yet had not the benefits of marriage. He was a homeowner, yet rarely if ever had the comforts of being home. He had shown himself willing to leave everything to pursue the kingdom, and yet, he maintained his responsibilities through it all. Recall that Paul later makes mention of others among the Apostles coming with their wives in tow. I am quite sure Peter was in view with this comment. He never abandoned his responsibilities, only submitted them to the demands of being an ambassador of Christ.

He was able to do these things – which were on a whole new scale after Jesus ascended – because he knew he had eternal life. He knew the Father and the Christ, and he knew They knew him. Here is the power to leave behind the things of this world. It lies in knowing that this is not all there is. Life goes on when this body has faded. In the scales of eternity, what are the trials of this brief life on earth? If time heals all wounds, just imagine what eternity does for them!

This is life: knowing the Father. Do you believe this?

Meeting the People - Simon the Zealot (07/16/06)