New Thoughts (4/26/00)
So, the Gentiles were either freshly converted, or yet to be converted pagans. That no support was taken from among them was not an act of maintaining Jewish purity, it was a care taken to leave no handhold for Satan. No doubt could be planted in the minds of their hearers as to their motives. Would that more ministries today understood the implications of this. How much of the shame that comes upon the church thanks to the power of media evangelists comes of ignoring this passage? Lord, I would that these "heroes" would once offer the Gospel free of appeals. It's clear that those spoken of here knew the gist of the letter they bore, if not the specific content. They knew that they came among friends with the recommendations of a trusted advisor. But, they also knew that there were no guarantees. The state of the early church was still highly unpredictable, one never knew how strong they'd be when one arrived. So, in spite of the seeming assurance of traveling with letters in hand, it was still an act of faith on their part to refuse any support coming of new converts, and trust themselves to the provision of others. Lord, more and more I feel drawn to remove support from these huge mail-in campaigns for political actions. Our finances are better used promoting those who freely offer the Gospel - the great and wonderful news that salvation can be had. I pray that You increase our opportunities to support such workers, and not only in finance, but in hospitality. Help us to open this house not just to the needy of our family, but to the use of Your ambassadors.