New Thoughts (11/03/11-11/04/11)
While it would be tempting to focus on the symbolism of the various components of this parable, it is a parable. The intent is not to drench every aspect in symbolism but to convey a higher truth by means of common imagery. As such, the first thing to be done is to establish what that common imagery would have been, for marriage customs change with time and geography. In that regard, I am turning to Alfred Edersheim’s ‘Sketches of Jewish Social Life’. He notes a few distinctions in custom even between Judea and Galilee of that period. The distinctions do not appear to much impact the course of the parable at hand, although they might be of interest in considering the marriage at Cana in Galilee, and certain other uses of the marriage motif.
Of particular note for this parable, Edersheim points to a custom of carrying lamps atop staves for such marriage processions as we are being shown here. This procession would also have been led by musicians, with it being a religious duty for those met along the way to join in. The numbering of the virgins as ten seems possibly to tie to the number of these stave lamps typically associated with public ceremonies of this sort. The festivities in view here would typically last a week in all.
Much is also made of the particulars of timing the wedding event. These were generally scheduled for Wednesdays, and never during feast days. The reason for this was to both allow the first day of the week for the preparations these bridesmaids would have been involved in, and also to allow immediate recourse to the Sanhedrin on Thursday if the bride was found to be unchaste. Bear in mind that there could be a lengthy period between betrothal and marriage, and that the betrothal was deemed as binding as we consider the marriage to be. In other words, a bride come to the wedding chamber who was found not to have been a virgin on her arrival must necessarily have violated the betrothal, and the wedding could be nullified on that basis.
This, of course, has been before us since the relating of Jesus’ birth at the opening of the Gospels. It remains of utmost import to us as we are the betrothed bride of Christ as we navigate the course of our days in this life. It is thus that the imagery of adultery play so heavily in the prophetic correctives of Scripture. However, the focus is not on the bride in this instance, but on the bridesmaids. As such, let me keep with the focus Jesus has selected here, and allow that to inform what I would understand from His words.
The setting we are given is that of the actual day of the wedding. The bridesmaids are with the bride, having assisted in preparing the house for the marriage feast. This, presumably, takes place either at the groom’s house or that of his parents, depending on his circumstance. He, in the meantime, would have been whisked away to spend time being honored by his own associates, friends and family coming to congratulate and to laud him. Then comes the procession. That is, as noted, a noisy affair, both because of the musicians leading the way and drawing in the crowds to accompany, and also because of the women shouting from the rooftops along the way, all combining to give advance announcement of the groom’s approach, however briefly in advance.
The ISBE comments on the fact that the groom’s entertainments before coming to the supper could easily last until midnight or later. As such, the picture we have of the bridesmaids napping for awhile as they awaited his arrival is entirely in keeping with custom. And the noise of his approach could be counted on to wake them in time to greet him. Whether they were charged with bearing these lamps upon the staves for the final approach is not entirely clear to me, although it seems a reasonable supposition. Thus, the five who have gone off to get oil and miss his arrival would have missed fulfilling a particularly critical part of their role in the marriage ceremony. If ten lamps were the customary number for such public rites, then they have not just missed the festivities, they have in some wise shamed the groom, leaving him well short of proper observance.
This begins to adjust how we ought to look upon the parable and its point. In my preparatory efforts, I was curious as to whether we ought to view the terminology as referring to virgins or bridesmaids. The majority of translations hold with virgins, but a few prefer the term bridesmaids. In reality, I expect that both terms ought to be understood as applying. These companions were not yet married, and would not be chosen from amongst the unmarriageable. One doesn’t select slatterns for such events. The parents would not allow it even if the bride would. All is done to point up the propriety of the event, and the fitness of the bride, after all. So, let us set the question of translation aside, recognizing that the one term is descriptive of their character in some wise, and the other of their role. Both are of importance to the picture.
Recognize, as well, that as this parable focuses on the bridesmaid, we should understand it as being particularly targeted at those who assist the bride in her preparations. If we maintain the standard symbolism of Christ as groom and Church as bride, then the bridesmaids would be those who shepherd the Church in His absence. In this long period between betrothal and marriage, they would have a hand in preserving the fitness of the bride. This is of particular moment when we begin to realize the strength of language that Jesus utilizes in describing the five who serve as the negative example.
Five were foolish and five were prudent, the NASB tells it. Many others make the contrast between the wise and the foolish ones. Prudence puts me in mind of planning ahead, setting aside for tomorrow. This perception is reinforced by the story as it unfolds. With that in mind, I look at this matter of foolishness, and my thoughts are of those who live in the moment. One thinks, for example, of the general perspective of youth, giving no thought to serious matters, but rather preferring to play and just enjoy life as it unfolds. Or, given the story’s ten maidens, we might think of five silly girls, mooning over the latest pop star, in contrast to the five who are seriously about their studies, and learning the skills necessary to managing a household.
The term that is so universally translated as foolish, though, is a much stronger term than that. If Zhodiates is to be believed on this, it is an insult much stronger than the raca that Jesus equated with murder in its seriousness (Mt 5:21-22). Raca, by this measure, only addresses the mental capacity: “empty headed”. Here, we are dealing with moros, from which our own moron. Yet, our modern usage of moron more nearly reflects the sense of raca. Moros is a matter of character, indicating a lack of moral worth. Well, if the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom (Ps 111:10), then what is reflected by wisdom’s absence, if not a missing sense of God’s worth? Thayer offers descriptives such as impious and godless. At the same time, there is the sense of being empty and useless. So, yes, there is the matter of lacking forethought, being dull and heedless, but it can convey much more.
In this case, I think it is reasonable to at least hear connotations of the deeper meaning. A picture of five silly girls doesn’t do much for the disciples. The picture of five morally worthless, impious assistants to the bride, whose purity is of tantamount importance, has bearing. Perhaps I am guilty of attempting to read more into this than is truly there, but it is not clear to me that this is the case.
So, we have the message providing application for those given charge over the Church. As such, we have an application fit for almost any representative member of that Church, for we all have charge over a portion, it seems, even if that portion is only ourselves for a season. As husbands, we have charge over ourselves plus our spouses in this matter of shepherding the bride. As parents, we add the charge of shepherding our children. As teachers, shepherding our students; as believers, shepherding in the lost that they may be counted amongst the found. It would seem that the more one’s responsibility in the body, the more this parable must needs be taken to heart. If you are an assistant to the bride, are you one who is morally bolstering her purity, or one who is morally worthless, and quite as likely to drag her down into your own sins?
Five shown the light for her. Five let the light go out. Given the rather consistent use of light as symbol for the knowledge of God, particularly as contrasted against the darkness of the world, what might we make of this? Five stood as witness. Five hid away. Five were consistent, as much as man can be consistent in anything, in their faith. Five conformed to the world. Five were focused on the kingdom, five were focused on pleasures of this life. In short, five were ready and five were not, and those who were ready were so because they were intentional about maintaining their readiness.
As to the matter of the wise five not sharing their oil, I don’t think that is a point to be pressed in this parable, any more than the likelihood of oil merchants being open for business in the wee hours of the morning. These are but a convenient device for explaining the absence of the foolish five when the groom arrives. Given the noise associated with the groom’s arrival, one might presume they have gone far afield in search of that oil. Or, they may just be too embarrassed to be part of the procession with their lamps unlit, and their failure in playing their part in the ceremony that much more painfully obvious. Whatever has happened to them, they are not ready, and the groom, when he comes, takes only those who are ready.
This is clearly the primary focus of the parable, as it has been a repeating theme throughout this discussion of the return of the Christ. Be ready. You don’t know when, and I’m not telling, but be ready. Be ready whenever it may be. Be ready at all times. As shepherds, or as bridesmaids in this image, if you are not ready yourself, how shall you assist the bride in being ready? You cannot. And more shall be the shame of the charges laid upon your head for such failure than for her in her own. For to whom much is given, much will be required (Lk 12:48). It is, in truth, an awesome responsibility to be charged with this role of bridesmaid to the Church, or to even the least of its components. To truly serve out that responsibility, one must surely begin with oneself.
There is a corollary to that point, though. We cannot be prepared wholly by another’s faith. If, indeed, there is a message to be taken from the refusal of the wise five to help, that is it. My faith is not enough to carry both me and you, nor is your faith sufficient to uphold us both. Your faith cannot make me ready, nor mine you. The pastor’s faith cannot prepare the church to stand as bride to Christ. Indeed, we might pay careful attention to the song of the Lamb’s marriage. “Rejoice and be glad! Give glory to Him! For the marriage of the Lamb is come, and His bride has made herself ready” (Rev 19:7). Who has done it? The bride has done it for herself!
Now, this must be held in careful tension with the recognition that the bride cannot possibly do it for herself. We are incapable of maintaining our own purity as we ought, let alone anybody else. It requires the indwelling Spirit to keep us at all. It requires the washing of the Word, of Christ Himself, to truly purify us as is fitting for the bride prepared. Let me just bring this out from the discussion of the wedding rites: This washing of the bride was part of the deal. There was a bath required, and then particular unguents to be applied, followed after by her being dressed in finery and jewelry befitting the occasion – that jewelry serving in part as a visible evidence of her dowry. But, it is the bath I have in view, the washing. One article noted that this was likely in sight as Paul discussed the cleansing preparatory work of Christ, for this image of Christ the groom and His bride the Church is of long standing. It had long since been applied to Israel – particularly in the imagery of the unfaithful wife. It is natural that this would be brought forward to the spiritual Israel of the Church, and John’s Revelation makes plain that the image was widespread as well as heaven sent.
So, the bride makes herself ready, and yet it is only by the work of her groom, the Christ, that she is made ready. As I said, there is a certain tension to be maintained here, between our responsibility and our inability. That we have responsibility to work at this is unavoidably clear from all that Jesus has been saying. Think about the constant drumbeat that we have heard through this whole Olivet Discourse: Be ready. Remain alert. Stay awake. It’s a repeated call for nonstop diligence. Nor is it restricted to this passage. Consider this from the teachings relayed in Luke 12: Having noted that, “If you cannot even do a very little thing, why be anxious about other matters?” (Lk 12:26), Jesus goes on to exhort His disciples to seek the kingdom of God not only first, but exclusively, knowing that the necessities of life will be seen to by Him as they do (Lk 12:31), and to advise them to store up spiritual treasures rather than fiduciary ones (Lk 12:33-34). Then comes the point: “Be dressed in readiness, and keep your lamps lit” (Lk 12:35).
In this instance, Jesus launches into the picture of servants waiting for their master to return from the wedding feast, but the point is much the same as it is for the bridal party here in Matthew’s account. Readiness is the point. The lit lamps are representative of that readiness. The call, then, is to be found ready.
And yet, we also know the reality of Jesus’ words to His three closest companions: “The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak” (Mt 26:41). This is not just the story of Peter, James and John. It’s the story of us all. It’s the summary statement of why it was necessary for Jesus to come and to die and to rise again in the first place. In this fallen flesh of ours it is impossible that we should remain ready. This remains as true of us after conversion as before, at least in the most absolute sense. Yet, after conversion we have this immeasurable boon: The Spirit indwelling. He is in us, and He is working. As Paul writes (and as I bring to mind so often), He is working in us, that we might both will and work for His good pleasure (Php 2:12). Apart from that, we might be willing, but we fail miserably at the working.
But, understand this: This is the promise! “I shall be whiter than snow” (Ps 51:7). Oh! Look at the whole verse! “Purify me with hyssop, and I shall be clean. Wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow.” Who does it? God does it. It is He who can create in me a clean heart and renew in me a steadfast spirit (Ps 51:10). Hear it echoed by Isaiah as he relays God’s message to Israel. “Learn to do good; seek justice, reprove ruthlessness. Defend the orphan and plead for the widow. Come reason with Me. Though your sins are a scarlet stain, they will be made as white as snow. Though they are crimson red, they will be like wool” (Isa 1:17-18). Yes, it is a promise, but it is promise with contingency: If, then. Yet, we know that it is by His power at work in us that we are empowered to accomplish the if, however imperfectly.
So, we work at it. We seek to be wise, to maintain our oil supply and keep our lamps lit. We seek to be found ready, even when we have faced so very many occasions of unpreparedness. We know our weakness, the impossibility of our task, but we keep at it. We persevere, knowing that when we stumble, He shall be there to lift us. When we err, He will be there to correct us. When we fade, He will be there to strengthen us. But, we persevere because He has instructed us to do so. We persevere because He has made it clear that this is our task, our training regimen. And, in our efforts to persevere, we have this marvelous confidence: His Word does not return to Him without accomplishing His desire, all His desire (Isa 55:11), and His desire for us is for good, not for evil (Jer 29:11). Indeed, His plans are such that He causes all things to work together for our good as we work together for His purpose out of our love for Him (Ro 8:28). That’s the thing: I am in that purpose for which He sent forth the Word of Christ. His Word has already returned to Him. With that, I can find certainty in knowing that because He is God, I shall be found ready. His Word has already accomplished His purpose in me. The bride has indeed made herself ready, but it is because the bridegroom has seen to it that she shall be empowered and enabled to do so.
Oh, my God, my King, my Love! How my heart thrills to be reminded of this confidence, and how it quails to consider this weakness. Yes, I so long to be found ready, and I thank You, I would thank You endlessly were this flesh able, for that certainty that I shall be. Yet, I know the trepidation of my soul as I consider the manifold failures I not only allow each day, but even plan into my day. Shall I deny it to You? What would be the point? You know. I may as well admit it. But, I admit it to my shame, Lord. I admit it as a confession of sin against you, and also as a confession of my weakness. In that, I but concur with You. This flesh is so weak, my God, and sometimes it seems like I am making no progress at all in these efforts to become more like You. How swiftly I can revert to form. Yet, I shall rejoice, because I know You are with me in this, that You are abiding with me and in me even today, even in spite of my sinful proclivities. You remain and You are unchanged. Therefore, I must change. I must be changed by Your unchangeableness. Thank You! Thank You that this is the necessary outcome. Thank You for accounting me righteous already, even though the work is far from complete. Thank You that in You I can be assured that the work will be complete, for You have already done the accounting. Holy Spirit, be near to my conscience. Keep me mindful of the kingdom to which I belong. Keep me conscious that this house is not my home, but only a temporary shelter along the way. Renew in me a clean heart, oh Lord! Wash me and I shall be clean.
There remains one thing I wish to explore, and that is how we ought to understand the matter of His not knowing the foolish five. This is one point where the several translations really begin to vary greatly. It wanders from the, “I have not known you” of Young’s to the more typical “I do not know you”, to “I don’t want to know you” as the NCV has it. So, which is it? The verb is a perfect indicative, given in the active voice, so it is clearly I the groom who is doing the knowing. That perfect tense, though, implies the continued result of prior action. So there is something to Young’s translation. But, the present application of “I do not know you” is also valid. The indicative mood tell us that the statement is one of certainty, of fact. Those five may have been known to the bride, but the groom not only counts them as unknown but states their being unknown to him as an assured truth.
The key, then, is in the tense. That perfect tense understanding doesn’t really translate very well into English. We might do well to combine Young’s with the more typical translation, and arrive at “I have not and do not know you.” How the NCV comes to the idea of “I don’t want to” I don’t know. That really does seem to be reading something back into the text that is not there to be read. Perhaps they ran on the assumption that the bridesmaids would necessarily be known to the groom, and therefore his statement must reflect will more than fact. But, that is not a safe assumption, and as I say, it’s not in the text to be inferred. It is a step too far. Let us stop, then, at “I have not and do not know you.” And, with the closing of the door, all opportunity for knowing you in the future has been cut off. That is a darkness too great to bear.
If there be anybody reading this who does not as yet count themselves part of the bride, who has not yet become betrothed to the Christ in repentance and rejoicing, I pray that you would take that to heart. Time is not infinite, certainly not the time allotted to each man’s life. God is amazingly patient, and He lengthens our days that we might repent and turn to Him in earnest. His desire is that all might repent, yet His will permits that His desire shall not be completely realized. I cannot offer some finely honed theory as to why He would refuse His own desire in this fashion, I can only tell you that this is how it is. Not everybody will be saved. There are those whom His will does not draw to Himself. There are going to be those who are not ready when He returns, and they will likely be the vast majority. But, the darkness! The darkness of finding oneself eternally on the wrong side of the door! While time remains, there is still time for you to consider and reconsider your resistance to the goodness of God. There is still time to step down off the pedestal of pride and confess your need for His rescue. But, just as we are not granted to know the time of His return, neither are we granted to know the time of our own demise. Time runs out, and tends to do so quite suddenly. I pray for you that you might make best use of the time that remains to you, and come to Him even now. Whatever has caused you to be reading this, whatever curiosity or even skepticism has led you to do so, I pray that He might break through, that He might use my poor musings to shed His light into your thinking in order that you, too, might be found ready when He comes.