New Thoughts
A number of thoughts need noting here. 1) It is clear from this and related texts that physical change is part of our inheritance, and not just spiritual change. It's there to be read, and there's no interpretation required to see it. So OK, that's settled. What I'm seeing there is that what applies to our spiritual change might just as properly be applied to our physical change. In other words, if we realize that our spiritual change is to remain a process of purification throughout this life, why do we not expect a process of physical 'purification' as well? We accept the aging of our bodies, why not the improvement of our bodies (i.e. - healing, repair) that foreshadow the fulfillment of the promise in us?
2) I am somewhat surprised at the strength of conviction I find in myself when facing the question of instant total sanctification vs. gradual deferred sanctification. Is this the guiding of the Holy Spirit, or just bullheadedness? Obviously, I pray it's the former. While I see no reason to believe there's a limit on God's limitless power, I don't see myself as fit to declare what is or isn't proper for His sovereign will to do. This is part of my reaction to Clarke's points - he seems to attempt to judge God's actions. I also find Barnes' argument that some being perfect implies all must be perfect compelling. Seeing that those who God declared righteous were to a man sinful before and sinful after, perfection seems clearly not to be the point. And I still feel that if we could attain to that perfection in this life, then Christ's work would by that be shown to have been unnecessary. It might be argued that it is because of His work in us that we can attain that perfection. OK. But the record of Scripture shows that when man is freed of immediate need for God, he rapidly forgets God most completely. It is in our own best interest to have constant reminder of our fragile state, and our total dependence upon God's grace.
3) I'm also taken by the interplay of God and man shown in the process of sanctification. We wouldn't even know Him had He not first reached out to us. Yet He wouldn't have reached out to us if we weren't interested. We can't attain to purity without Him, yet He won't work toward purity in us unless we are working toward it ourselves. We won't be made pure by seeing Him, and yet we will. The resolution of this last seeming paradox appears to be that we will first see Him as all will see Him - in His role as judge appearing as the Son of Man. For those who have declared against Him, this appearance will be to their dismay, and brings their condemnation to a perpetual punishment. For those whom He has declared brothers, this same appearance will trigger the completion of their purification - breaking the last binding ties of the world and its sinfulness on their lives, and thus preparing them to see Him in His fulness! Only the pure can see Him as true God, and only those who have seen Him as Savior can have been made pure. Again I say: Awesome!