New Thoughts (3/9/01-3/11/01)
There are a pair of seeming conflicts here that require resolution in our thoughts.
First there's the ever present issue of faith vs. works. In so many places, we see Scripture telling us that our salvation comes by faith alone. This has been the teaching of every Protestant church throughout their history. It's the very reason for the Protestant church, and those others that have grown from that root. The walk of the Christian begins in faith, with that one being justified due solely to his faith and belief in Jesus Christ and His work on the cross. The Christian, once justified, continues to walk in belief again solely by faith in Christ. I look at the collection of verses that were brought out in one or the other of the commentaries: Our justification is a gift of God's grace (Ro 3:24), coming by faith apart from works (Ro 3:28), and bringing us to peace with God through Jesus Christ (Ro 5:1); which knowing, we know all the more clearly that we are saved from God's wrath through this same Jesus (Ro 5:9). And yet, in the same letter, we are told that the hearers of the Law are not those who are justified before God, but the doers thereof are (Ro 2:13). How does this resolve? How can Paul say that justification comes to the doer of the Law, and in almost the same breath, say that justification comes by faith apart from works? Does it not come back to the attitude of the heart? Barnes told us that "people seek to save themselves by their own works. God's plan is to save them by the merits of Jesus Christ." Clarke noted that the rejected Jews had become enamored of the observances, and failed to come to understanding of the saving Christ to whom those observances intended to lead them. Mr. Henry reminds us that we are just by faith, and we live by faith. It is not begun in faith, and grown in works, but remains a matter of faith throughout. All of these point to one fact: we come to Him by faith (and that, not of ourselves). The faith by which we came to believe certainly had nothing to do with our own prior actions. Nothing I had done in my own power had brought me to belief, and nothing in my own nature recommends itself to God as 'deserving' to be granted believing faith and salvation. I did not get here under my own power. Some have expanded on this thought, pushed it beyond the legal limit, as it were, and arrived at the idea that we no longer need to do much of anything, nor pay any great attention to God's preceding laws, since our actions don't matter anyway. As usual, the truth stretched and pulled has become a lie in that situation. Of course we are still obligated to God's commands, how could it be otherwise? Of course we are intended to do good works. We are told that such works have been placed before us so that we can do them! But why? Why do we do them? Here is the fine line. If we continue in the manner of the old covenant way, trying to earn our badge of righteousness by following all the rules, we do so in spite of our knowing the truth to which those things pointed - we fall into the very same trap by which the Jews showed that they rejected Messiah. We get so caught up in the observances that we forget their point. This can happen in our services of worship just as easily as in our efforts to obey the Law, and to do good works, so Daddy will be pleased with us. When we do this, we have rejected Messiah no less than the Jews before us. We have shown that we never understood the things that would lead to peace with God, and we sever ourselves from His grace. This is the lesson of Scripture. This is the word of the Lord to us! And yet, there's that verse: the doers are justified. What we need to understand is that the doers are not justified because they do, rather they do because they have been justified, because they have been saved, and the love of God that has been shed abroad in their hearts has so overflowed, has so transformed them and brought them into love for God, that their greatest desire is to obey Him, to show their thankfulness by some small token, to share that love with others by their acts of kindness. The truly saved could no more help doing the works of the Law, than the living can help breathing. Perhaps Wycliffe's notes regarding belief will best sum up the relationship between our faith and our works. He points out that this word 'belief' goes beyond the obvious meaning to include ideas of trust and commitment, of handing one's self over to another. It is not intellectual assent, but full involvement in that which is believed. Such full involvement will show in 'a dedication and consecration apparent in every aspect of life.'
This rather cleanly walks into the second controversy that comes up in this regard. Are we saved once for all, or can we somehow lose that salvation? This is something that deserves a great deal of exploration, and that exploration needs to be most careful to find what Scripture says and not what man thinks. As such, I'm thinking I shall have to put this off to a side study. Amongst other things, I need to be reminded which verse Pastor was looking at that seemed to indicate the possibility of failing. I know there are several, including one I used to offer myself, but it's been a while. But then there are things like this bit from JF & B:
It is the means of salvation, of complete deliverance from sin and death, leading to eternal life. It is not a temporary salvation from which one could fall away, but it is the power of eternal salvation to them that believe (1Pe 1:5 - who are then protected by the power of God through faith for salvation in the last time). The saved cannot be lost. (Mk 16:16-17 - Those who believe and have been baptized shall be saved, casting out demons in His name, and speaking with new tongues.)
And there are any number of other verses that seem to support a view of permanence. There's the factor that we were predestined, called, justified, and sanctified by our Lord. There's the factor that we were so chosen before birth (so that we couldn't boast of our actions deserving). All points to the fact that our salvation is by God. He has chosen to turn us over to the care of His Son, and His Son declares that He lost none of those His Father put in His hands. Is God not all powerful? Is He somehow unable to keep us until that day? As I said, I want to chase this out more thoroughly, but I did want to put a few thoughts here for safe keeping.
We have walked through any number of views of what is meant by 'the righteousness of God,' and what is meant by 'from faith to faith.' All of these views hold to a facet of the whole, and all of them combined seem likely to fail to fully describe the complete picture. J,F & B seemed inclined to reject any number of these views out of hand, and yet, I think each offers us a perspective from which to view the full wonder of God's grace in salvation. Each offers us a part of understanding just how much we are dependent on the faith of God for our being who we are. Perhaps there is danger in misunderstanding the righteousness of God. The issue of infused vs. imputed was raised, but I confess I don't fully see the problem there. Perhaps I need to look more closely. But at least in the realm of 'faith to faith,' I find all the views just make me more appreciate the full power of this faith God has given me. To Him be the glory!
Was it for life? A Quest for Permanence (3/12/01-3/16/01)